ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Wirtz Law Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Jaguar Over I-PACE Battery Fires

Jaguar I pace fire 1

San Diego, California – Wirtz Law, a renowned lemon law firm in California, is leading a class action lemon law complaint against Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, and other defendants. The lawsuit surrounds the alleged battery fire risks associated with all 2019-2024 Jaguar I-PACE vehicles in California, representing a potentially groundbreaking case in the automotive industry.

The plaintiff, California resident Sharon Joyce, purchased a new 2020 Jaguar I-PACE in July 2019. She has since experienced several issues with the vehicle, leading to multiple unsuccessful attempts to seek repair. These included defects discovered during the pre-delivery inspection that indicated “reduced electric vehicle range.” Despite being aware of such, the lawsuit claims that Jaguar was unprepared to rectify the issues due to a lack of repair procedures.

By January 2020, Jaguar issued a software update, H264 to deliver up to 12 miles of additional real-world range on a full charge. However, the complaint claims that this software update changed the battery’s operational state to a dangerously low level, leading to another high-voltage battery failure in April 2023 that left her stranded.. After multiple battery replacements, the vehicle continues to display battery fault and warning lights.

The lawsuit further alleges that Jaguar knowingly concealed the high-risk defects and, in July 2023, issued a recall letter warning I-PACE owners of increased fire and injury risks associated with the vehicle’s high-voltage battery. The recall notice also advised owners to limit their vehicle charging to 75% and to park outside due to potential fire hazards.

The allegations claim that Jaguar was aware of at least eight battery fires, at the time of the recall announcement and that these critical battery systems were defective even before the vehicles were built. Thus, the complaint says Jaguar I-PACE owners were left with devalued I-PACE vehicles and no available repairs.

Wirtz Law, alongside the O’Connor Law Group, is representing Sharon Joyce in this class action lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Lemon law firm, Wirtz Law‘s complaint is claiming that Jaguar’s actions represent a clear violation of consumer protection rights and is committed to ensuring justice for the affected I-PACE owners of California.

Photo credit: Jaguar I-PACE Fire in Florida – June 17, 2022 / Electrek.com

Case Information
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Sharon Joyce v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, et. al.
Case Number: 3:23-cv-01434



Wirtz Law tries more cases to jury verdict in a year than most attorneys attempt in a career. Wirtz Law has recovered over $45 Million for California consumers and is one of the most respected lemon law attorneys in the state.

Wirtz Law
4370 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92122
(858) 879-3557
https://www.wirtzlaw.com/
Press Contact : Richard Wirtz

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.