ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

3 Pharma Stocks' Post-Earnings Price Moves

ⓘ This article is third-party content and does not represent the views of this site. We make no guarantees regarding its accuracy or completeness.
3 Pharma Stocks Post-Earnings Price Moves

The health care sector is just barely participating in the S&P 500’s nascent rally, but pharmaceuticals such as AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV), Merck (NYSE: MRK) and Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) are holding up well relative to the broader market. 

All three reported earnings recently, and while none got a bounce, all are holding above previous structure lows. 

As a whole, the health care sector has notched a return of 0.98% in the past month, as tracked by the Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLV). Although the sector is boasting gains, it still lags every other sector in the past month. 

AbbVie, whose top revenue-generating drug is rheumatoid arthritis treatment Humira, earned $3.37 in the second quarter on revenue of $14.6 billion. Those were year-over-year increases of 11% and 4%, respectively. 

The company’s revenue has slowed since December 2020. One reason for caution: AbbVie’s exclusive marketing for Humira is ending, as generic versions of the drug will be hitting the market. 

Humira notched big sales in the recent quarter, helping to offset reduced demand for AbbVie’s cancer treatment, Imbruvica, which is losing ground to AstraZeneca’s (NYSE: AZN) Calquence.

For the full year, analysts expect AbbVie to earn $13.86 per share, a gain of 10% over 2021. That’s seen declining by 14% next year, which is not surprising, given the prognosis for Humira and Imbruvica. 

AbbVie has been correcting since April. Its current formation shows a 23% drawdown, but the stock remains above its June 16 low of $135.76.

Meanwhile, Merck earned $1.87 per share, up 43% from the year-ago quarter. Revenue was $14.6 billion (yes, the same number as AbbVie), a year-over-year increase of 28%. 

According to MarketBeat earnings data, the company beat analysts’ bottom-line views by $0.18 per share. It was the fourth quarter in a row that Merck outpaced expectations.

Revenue topped views in each of the past four quarters.

Revenue from the company’s Covid treatment, Lageverio, declined to around $1.2 billion from $3.25 billion in the prior quarter. Clinical trials revealed that Pfizer’s Paxlovid treatment was more effective than Lagevrio. 

Meanwhile, Keytruda sales increased by 26% to $5.3 billion, and sales of Gardisil, its treatment for human papillomavirus, grew 36% to $1.7 billion.

Merck shares initially began their decline in late May, then attempted a rebound a month later, hitting resistance at $96.72 before retreating again. Given the market’s ongoing volatility this summer, it’s not unusual to see a failed breakout attempt. At this juncture, Merck shares remain in correction mode, underperforming the broader market.

Pfizer has been in a correction since December. It reached a structured low of $45.40 on February 24. The stock has held above that level since then, despite sinking in mid-June before another rally attempt.

The company reported second-quarter earnings of $2.04 per share, topping views by $0.09. The company also exceeded top-line expectations, with sales coming in at $27.74, ahead of analysts estimate of $26.20 billion. 

The report marked a year-over gain of 47% on the top line and a 92% gain on the bottom line.

Looking to the full year, Pfizer reiterated its sales guidance of $32 billion for its Covid vaccines, as well as guidance of $22 billion in revenue for Paxlovid.

The pharmaceutical industry in general is “middle of the pack,” in terms of performance. That hasn’t changed much in the past two months, although other areas of the health care sector, such as hospitals and long-term care facilities, are faring better.

While the idea of snapping up undervalued shares is appealing, the continued volatility in even large-cap healthcare names means caution is warranted. While AbbVie, Merck, and Pfizer all have fairly low betas relative to the broader market, there’s always added risk with an individual stock. 

That’s often amplified by the nuances of clinical trials, generic drug sales, and other developments specific to the pharmaceutical industry. In addition, with other healthcare industries performing better, the pharma stocks may still be in “watch list” mode until they prove they can launch a sustained rally. 

Report this content

If you believe this article contains misleading, harmful, or spam content, please let us know.

Report this article

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  263.99
+8.91 (3.49%)
AAPL  271.06
-2.37 (-0.87%)
AMD  347.81
+42.48 (13.91%)
BAC  52.05
-0.42 (-0.80%)
GOOG  342.32
+4.57 (1.35%)
META  675.03
+15.88 (2.41%)
MSFT  424.62
+8.87 (2.13%)
NVDA  208.27
+8.63 (4.32%)
ORCL  173.28
-3.00 (-1.70%)
TSLA  376.30
+2.58 (0.69%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.