ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

EU Demands Prepaid Waste Disposal in Fast Fashion

By: MerxWire

People wear different styles of clothing and shoes to express themselves and show respect for various occasions. Fast fashion brands, known for their diverse styles, have gained global popularity. However, this trend has also sparked environmental concerns. According to the EU, the average person discards 12 kilograms of clothing and shoes annually, leading to serious environmental disasters.


With the prevalence of fast fashion, EU statistics show that each person produces an average of 12 kilograms of
clothing and shoe waste every year. (Photo via unsplash.com)

TAIPEI, TAIWAN (Merxwire) –Many people think that different occasions require different styles of clothes and shoes. On the one hand, they can express themselves, and on the other hand, they can show respect to the occasion. Therefore, fast fashion brands with quick update speed and diverse styles have been popular worldwide for many years. However, the concept of rapid renewal has also caused a lot of environmental controversies. According to EU statistics, each person throws away 12 kilograms of clothes and shoes every year on average, increasing the burden on the environment and the cost of disposal.

Because fast fashion products are updated quickly and the prices of some brands are quite affordable, consumers will accidentally buy more. It also increases the amount of clothes and shoes discarded every year, creating a garbage problem. Even though various recycling methods have been promoted in recent years to reduce the impact on the global environment, the results have been limited. Currently, about 22% of discarded clothes and shoes can be reused in different forms, but 78% of them still need to be buried or incinerated, so they are considered a modern environmental disaster.

What’s the price of fashion? The World Bank estimates that the fashion industry’s annual carbon emissions account for approximately 10% of total global emissions. In 2020, the global textile industry used approximately 175 million tons of primary raw materials in production, which is an astonishing figure. The production of textiles consumes large amounts of water, including 20 billion tons of rainwater stored in the soil to produce cotton and 4 billion tons of surface water and groundwater used to make finished products. Water consumption is second only to the food industry and entertainment and cultural industries. Therefore, the European Union has proposed a draft for levying waste management fees for clothing manufacturers. It is expected that a piece of clothing will be charged 0.12 euros for subsequent processing.

For the sake of the sustainability of the earth, this is a problem that must be solved, so experts are trying to find ways to improve this problem. In addition to planning to collect processing fees to cover the costs required during processing, it is also hoped to reduce the problem of over-speeding or excessive production by apparel manufacturers. At the same time, we are also looking for solutions to reuse waste and turn it into reusable materials, which means returning to the circular economy and reducing waste.

The first step that can be taken is to establish a professional second-hand recycling mechanism and sales platform so that discarded clothes can be recycled effectively. These clothes can be put on the shelves for sale after being sorted, cleaned, disinfected, photographed, and basic information compiled. Second-hand clothing platform operators mentioned that their platform has listed more than 90,000 pieces of clothing, and 70% of them have been sold through their business model, saving more than 1.2 million kilograms of carbon emissions and more than 200 million yuan of water resources, bringing sustainable green contributions to the earth.

In some European countries, there are large clothing recycling charity centers, where there are piles of clothes. Many working women stand next to the conveyor belt, sorting clothes one by one. Some of the clothes will be sent to recycling program stores for sale after cleaning. In addition to being cheaper than brand-new clothes, the main purpose of clothes in second-hand stores is to return these discarded clothes to a sustainable circular economy. Therefore, they plan to expand the number of second-hand clothing stores in Spain from 100 to more than 300 to implement this environmental protection plan.

EU has proposed a draft waste management fee for clothing manufacturers to cover the various costs required to
deal with this discarded clothing. (Photo via unsplash.com)

In addition to returning discarded clothes to second-hand platforms or stores for sale, another way to return to the circular economy is through classification and reproducing. During the recycling process, clothing sorting equipment equipped with infrared spectrum analysis and optical identification technology is used to detect the fiber content of clothing and classify it according to color and material. Using technology to help these clothes find reuse value, they can be transformed into new clothes and then sold.

The industry will use the sorted recycled clothing to make polyester pellets through chemical decomposition technology, convert it into the main raw material for recycled clothing, and put it into the clothing production line. Some brands will also add recycled PET bottle plastic and remake it into recycled clothing made of polyester to achieve the sustainable goal of recycling waste clothing. This will reduce the waste of agricultural raw materials and water resources, and achieve the environmental benefits of energy conservation and carbon reduction.

However, recycling clothes also has difficulties that need to be solved. Because it is reconstructed from multiple pieces of clothing, it is difficult to label the material, so it can usually only be recycled once. In addition, the material is mainly polyester fiber, so it is often made into functional clothing, and it is difficult to make non-functional clothing. There are many additional processing costs in the remanufacturing process, so the total production cost is about 30% higher than that of ordinary clothing. More efforts need to be made to educate manufacturers and consumers so that they are willing to bear higher production and consumption costs to care for the earth.

The clothing industry mentioned that about 30% of consumers currently understand the mechanism for recycling their clothes. However, due to concerns about virus residues after COVID-19, some customers who were originally willing to buy second-hand clothes have also become hesitant. They need to spend more time communicating with consumers. In addition to proposing a draft for levying disposal fees and striving to implement textile recycling, the EU’s relevant environmental regulations also include prohibiting the destruction of unsold clothing, establishing a complete waste recycling system, and dealing with false green labels. They hope that strict regulations will be used to control excessive resource consumption and reduce the environmental disaster caused by fast fashion.

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.