ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

DesignRush Unveils U.S. State Rankings for AI Tool Energy Costs

By: Newsfile

Miami, Florida--(Newsfile Corp. - June 25, 2025) - DesignRush, a B2B marketplace connecting businesses with agencies, has just released a new report analyzing the hidden energy cost of AI.

Using consumption estimates from MIT Technology Review and electricity pricing from ElectricChoice.com, the report presents the first state-by-state breakdown of how much U.S. businesses pay in electricity to run their AI tools.

Key Takeaways on AI Operating Costs

  • Based on typical AI tools usage from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and other productivity AI chatbots, the average AI electricity use per employee is 754 kilowatt-hours annually - about the same as running a refrigerator.

  • The average energy cost per AI-using employee is $114/year.

  • Hawaii is the most expensive state, with businesses paying over $3,276 per year on average to power their AI tools, due to the nation's highest electricity rate ($0.40/kWh) and fifth-highest energy use.

  • South Dakota, on the other hand, is the most affordable, with businesses paying just $497 annually. This is due to both low AI energy use (4,314 kWh per business) and a lower electricity rate of just $0.12 per kWh, one of the lowest in the country.

  • High-adoption states like Texas and Florida balance scale with affordability:

    • Texas: 148,000+ AI-using businesses at $663/year each.

    • Florida: High adoption with moderate cost of $815/year.

This ranking is based on state-level AI adoption rates, employee usage estimates, and commercial electricity prices, revealing the true cost behind the growing use of generative and productivity AI tools.

As AI use scales, understanding operational energy costs becomes vital for budgeting, ESG compliance, and infrastructure planning.

Top 5 Most Expensive States for Businesses to Run AI

RankStateAvg Cost per kWhAI's Energy Demand per Year (kWh)Annual AI Cost per Business
1Hawaii$0.4024.62M$3,276.47
2Massachusetts$0.27281.16M$2,149.78
3Maine$0.2343.66M$1,981.73
4California$0.271.54B$1,975.82
5Alaska$0.2028.07M$1,631.64
6New York$0.22556.25M$1,617.09
7New Hampshire$0.2238.90M$1,518.09
8Rhode Island$0.2542.28M$1,477.87
9Connecticut$0.26101.65M$1,412.06
10Vermont$0.2121.92M$1,353.32

 

Top 5 Most Affordable States to Run AI:

RankStateAvg Cost per kWhAI Energy Consumption per Business (kWh)Annual AI Cost per Business
1South Dakota$0.124314.05$496.98
2North Dakota$0.095896.55$513.00
3Nebraska$0.095746.57$545.35
4North Carolina$0.124951.7$604.60
5Utah$0.096979.72$656.09
6Texas$0.125486.2$663.28
7Wyoming$0.106756.86$704.74
8Montana$0.116182.52$705.43
9Idaho$0.107409.29$715.74
10Washington$0.116435.72$721.44

 

The full dataset includes each state's AI adoption rates, employee estimates, electricity usage, and dollar cost per business, helping organizations benchmark the operational footprint of their AI tools.

About DesignRush

DesignRush.com is a B2B marketplace and media platform connecting businesses with agencies through expert reviews and agency ranking lists, awards, knowledge resources, and personalized agency recommendations for vetted projects.

Media Contact
Anonta Khan
anonta@designrush.com

SOURCE: DesignRush

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/256794

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.