ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Misses Q2 Sales Targets

TSLA Cover Image

Electric vehicle pioneer Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) fell short of the market’s revenue expectations in Q2 CY2025, with sales falling 11.8% year on year to $22.5 billion. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.40 per share was in line with analysts’ consensus estimates.

Is now the time to buy Tesla? Find out by accessing our full research report, it’s free.

Tesla (TSLA) Q2 CY2025 Highlights:

  • Vehicles Delivered: 384,122 vs analyst estimates of 397,843 (3.4% miss)
  • Revenue: $22.5 billion vs analyst estimates of $22.74 billion (1.1% miss)
  • Operating Profit (GAAP): $923 million vs analyst estimates of $1.21 billion (23.6% miss)
  • EPS (non-GAAP): $0.40 vs analyst expectations of $0.40 (1.1% miss)
  • Automotive Revenue: $16.66 billion vs analyst estimates of $16.53 billion (small beat)
  • Energy Revenue: $2.79 billion vs analyst estimates of $3.22 billion (13.3% miss)
  • Services Revenue: $3.05 billion vs analyst estimates of $2.97 billion (2.5% beat)
  • Gross Margin: 17.2%, in line with the same quarter last year
  • Operating Margin: 4.1%, down from 6.3% in the same quarter last year
  • Free Cash Flow Margin: 0.6%, down from 5.3% in the same quarter last year
  • Market Capitalization: $1.07 trillion

Revenue Growth

Tesla proves that huge, scaled companies can still grow quickly. The company’s revenue base of $25.71 billion five years ago has more than tripled to $92.72 billion in the last year, translating into an incredible 29.2% annualized growth rate.

Over the same period, Tesla’s automotive peers Rivian, General Motors, and Ford put up annualized growth rates of 195%, 10.1%, and 4%, respectively. Just note that while Rivian has the most similar vehicles to Tesla, comparisons aren’t exactly apples-to-apples because it’s growing from a much smaller revenue base and selling its EVs at a loss. Quarterly Revenue of Automobile Manufacturers

Long-term growth reigns supreme in fundamentals, but for disruptive companies like Tesla, a half-decade historical view may miss emerging trends in autonomous vehicles and energy. Tesla’s recent performance shows its demand has slowed significantly as its revenue was flat over the last two years. Tesla Year-On-Year Revenue Growth

This quarter, Tesla missed Wall Street’s estimates and reported a rather uninspiring 11.8% year-on-year revenue decline, generating $22.5 billion of revenue. Looking ahead, sell-side This projection is admirable for a company of its scale and illustrates the market is baking in success for its newer products.

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report one of our favorites growth stories.

Automotive: Act One

Revenue: The Race For Dominance

Tesla is primarily an automobile manufacturer today and generates 76% of its revenue through the sale and leasing of EVs. It historically produced expensive, high-end EVs, but after years of operating losses, has shifted its focus to the mass market with affordable vehicles. The Model 3 and Model Y (released in 2017 and 2019) are the headliners of this story, and we’ll dive into their impacts below.

Over the last five years, Tesla’s vehicles sold grew by 34% annually to 1.68 million units in the last year. This is meaningfully above the its 26.2% annualized growth rate for Automotive revenue, implying that its average vehicle price fell.

Tesla Quarterly Vehicles Sold

Specifically, Tesla's average revenue per vehicle sold was $41,948 for the trailing 12 months, noticeably lower than the $56,686 price tag in 2020.

Tesla Quarterly Average Vehicle Price

These unit and pricing trends uncover three facets of the company’s automotive business:

1) It has achieved its goal of selling more Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, which carry lower price tags than other models, 2) the scaling production of its mass-market models is boosting manufacturing efficiency because it lowers the fixed cost per vehicle sold, and 3) rather than increasing profitability by reaping the cost-saving benefits, Tesla is passing them to customers through price reductions.

In Q2, Tesla’s vehicles sold shrank by 13.5% year on year to 384,122 units and missed Wall Street’s expectations. Putting this print side-by-side with its 16.2% Automotive revenue decline suggests an average vehicle price of $43,374, down from $44,775 in the same quarter last year.

Unit Economics: The Impact Of Price Cuts

There’s no denying automobile manufacturing is a tough business. Few upstarts succeed because incumbents like General Motors and Ford can afford to break even on the initial sale of vehicles and instead make money on parts and servicing, which come many years down the line. This is why new entrants such as Rivian have negative gross margins - they must price competitively, and their fleets are too young to generate substantial aftermarket revenues.

Tesla does not disclose the operating profitability of its segments, but we can analyze the gross margins of its various divisions to see how it stacks up. For Automotive, this metric reflects how much revenue is left after paying for the raw materials, components, and direct labor costs that go into manufacturing and producing its vehicles.

Thankfully for investors, Tesla has crossed the chasm as its Automotive segment boasted an average gross margin of 22.8% over the last five years. While it may be low in absolute terms, Tesla’s margin was best in class for the industry and illustrates its superior pricing power and procurement capabilities. Its breathing room also explains why the company can squeeze its competitors by slashing prices.

Quarterly Gross Margin of Automobile Manufacturers

Looking under the hood, Automotive’s annual gross margin fell from 24% five years ago to 18.4% in the last year. This is a direct result of its price cuts and shows the company is sacrificing higher profits today to increase its installed base and potentially secure longer-term recurring revenue streams. Its gross margin ticked lower this quarter to 17.2%.

Key Takeaways from Tesla’s Q2 Results

We struggled to find many positives in these results. Its revenue missed, as the miss in Energy trumped the beat in Services and in-line print for Automotive. Overall, this was a weaker quarter. The stock traded down 3.7% to $320.57 immediately following the results.

Tesla’s latest earnings report disappointed. One quarter doesn’t define a company’s quality, so let’s explore whether the stock is a buy at the current price. When making that decision, it’s important to consider its valuation, business qualities, as well as what has happened in the latest quarter. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it’s free.

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.