ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Report: SEEM alternatives would save $100 billion, cut more emissions

SEEM, which is under review by FERC, would produce the lowest cost savings and emission reductions of available options, according to a new report.
Follow @EngelsAngle

An energy market proposal by Southern utilities would produce the lowest cost savings and emission reductions of available options, and would imperil decarbonization goals, according to a new report.

The study -- conducted by Vibrant Clean Energy on behalf of the American Council on Renewable Energy -- compared the proposed Southeast Energy Exchange Market to an optimal energy imbalance market (EIM) and regional transmission organization (RTO), finding an EIM would save $111 billion by 2040, while an RTO would save $119 billion.

Additionally, modeling from the study projects that an EIM and RTO would reduce carbon emissions by 67 and 70%, respectively, over the same time period, compared to just 30% under the SEEM framework.

“The southeastern United States is one of the largest regions in the country without an organized wholesale power market, and these modeling results show that an EIM or RTO operating in the proposed SEEM footprint would generate significantly more cost savings and emission reductions than the SEEM framework, while also creating more electricity sector jobs over the next 20 years,” ACORE President and CEO Gregory Wetstone said. “Setting up a real-time energy market in the Southeast is a good economic option for the region that would also reduce climate impacts, improve local air quality and give utilities the best shot at meeting their decarbonization goals.”

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is evaluating the SEEM proposal, which is backed by Duke Energy, Southern Company, Dominion Energy, and TVA, among others. The 15-member utilities claim that the new bilateral market would “materially benefit” the approximately 5 million households within the proposed coverage region by enhancing opportunities for competition and access to lower-cost energy.

Utilities would be unlikely to reach 100% decarbonization targets under SEEM, according to the new report. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress would reduce their emissions by 16.7% and 21%, respectively, by 2040, while Southern Company would reduce its emissions by 15%.

Duke Energy, Southern Company, Dominion Energy, and TVA are among the 15 member utilities behind the Southeast Energy Exchange Market (SEEM).

The study highlights an RTO as producing the greatest cost savings and emissions reductions, when compared to the SEEM framework, through expanded transmission and capacity. An RTO would also create more than 1 million jobs, the authors wrote.

Jeff Dennis, managing director and general counsel for Advanced Energy Economy, joined Renewable Energy World’s John Engel to discuss the latest back-and-forth between SEEM and FERC, and what comes next. Before joining AEE, Dennis spent over a decade at FERC.

Subscribe to Renewable Energy World’s free, weekly newsletter for more stories like this

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.