ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale mocked for timid critique of Biden's habit of 'inventing or embellishing stories'

CNN's Daniel Dale was shredded by conservatives for what some considered to be a milquetoast critique of Biden compared to how he spoke about Trump in the past.

Conservatives hit CNN for taking too long to finally call out President Biden for false claims after fact-checking his claims about his actions in the days after Sept. 11, 2001.

CNN anchor Brianna Keilar observed on "CNN News Central" Tuesday that Biden is "facing criticism for falsely claiming that he was in New York City at Ground Zero the day after 9/11," recounting that he had made a speech about this on Monday to an audience of military and first responders as he commemorated the attack’s 22nd anniversary.

She introduced CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale who noted Biden "went nine days after the attack, on September 20th, 2001, when he went when a bipartisan delegation of senators." 

He said that some may defend Biden’s tall tales, but argued, "It’s 9/11. It’s sensitive. He’s speaking to military and first responders, so I think the facts matter." He went on to observe that Biden "has a pattern, at this point, of either inventing or embellishing stories about his own past, his biography. He did it three times in one speech last month alone."

'GROSS:' BIDEN OPENS 9/11 REMARKS WITH JOKE ABOUT BEING AN ALL-AMERICAN IN HIGH SCHOOL

After citing six examples, ranging from claiming to have visited a synagogue after a shooting to being arrested during a civil rights protest, Dale concluded, "Whatever his intensions, whether it’s foggy memory about stuff that’s gone on decades ago or deliberate embellishment, this is an unfortunate pattern that keeps coming up again and again with Joe Biden."

Many conservative commentators suggested that this was too little, too late, for the CNN fact-checker.

"At this point?" The Spectator contributing editor Stephen L. Miller asked, referring to Dale’s wording. "@ddale8, have you listened to Joe Biden at **any point** circa 1983 up to now? You think this all just started ‘at this point’?"

In a following tweet, he wrote, "Even when he does his actual job he still manages clown shoes."

Townhall.com columnist Derek Hunter slammed Dale for refusing to use the word "lie" when discussing Biden.

"Weird how @ddale8 just can't bring himself to use the word ‘lie.’ He also avoided mentioning how [often] Joe claimed his son ‘died in Iraq.’ Another lie, but a useful one Joe sickly uses when talking with Gold Star families. But @CNN's ‘fact checker’ won't touch it."

He continued the callout in a following post, "We need a word for knowingly saying something that isn't true, and doing so repeatedly. @ddale8, any suggestions?"

BIDEN SAYS HOUSE BURNED ‘WITH MY WIFE IN IT,’ ADDING TO LONG LIST OF EMBELLISHED STORIES

Dale has used the term "liar" in the past, when discussing then-President Trump.

Former software engineer Thomas Jeans shared a clip of Dale condemning Trump as a "serial liar" in 2020 and contesting a series of claims.

"[N]otice the difference in language and enthusiasm when their phony ‘fact checker’ is talking about President Trump?" Jeans asked in a post. 

Commentator Erick Erickson suggested, "If Biden were a Republican, the press would be way more comfortable saying liar instead of trying to soften it up."

For more Culture, Media, Education, Opinion, and channel coverage, visit foxnews.com/media 

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.