ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Driving Test Routes: Ethical Preparation or Digital-Age Cheating?

As UK driving test pass rates remain below 50% and waiting times stretch beyond five months in some centres, thousands of learner drivers are increasingly turning to digital tools for an advantage. One of the most debated methods is practising driving test routes. Some see it as sensible preparation, while others regard it as “cheating” the system.

Disclosure: This release contains affiliate links. Some links may generate a commission if readers choose to subscribe or make a purchase, but this does not affect the price paid by the consumer.

A tougher test than ever

Government data shows the car practical test pass rate has held steady at around 47% (DVSA, 2023/24).

Compared to 20 years ago, the test is considerably more challenging. Since 2017, candidates have been required to drive independently for 20 minutes, and most tests now include sat nav driving (DVSA, Driving test changes in 2017). Learners must also navigate multi-lane roundabouts, complex junctions, and rural high-speed roads that can pose a challenge even to the most confident drivers.

Failing once adds to the frustration. Although candidates are only required to wait a legal minimum of 10 working days before booking again (Gov.uk – Car driving test results), in reality, the backlog means most face a delay of 18 to 20 weeks on average, with some centres exceeding 5 months (The Guardian, July 2024).

DVSA once published routes, then banned them

Until 2010, the DVSA (then the DSA) openly published its official driving test routes. The practice was scrapped amid concerns that learners were memorising them instead of demonstrating safe, adaptable driving (Road Safety GB, 2010).

A divided industry

The issue splits instructors and examiners alike:

  • Critics argue it’s little more than gaming the test, eroding the unpredictability designed into the exam.
  • Supporters say it’s no different to practising past exam papers, helping learners tackle known “hot spots” and easing crippling nerves on the day.

What’s undeniable is the spike in demand. Google Trends data shows search interest in “driving test routes” has climbed steadily in recent years, reflecting learners’ desperation to secure every possible edge.

RouteBuddy: crowdsourced routes with AI support

At the heart of this shift is RouteBuddy, an app used by thousands of learners across the UK. It offers practice routes around local test centres by combining:

  • Instructor submission - with Approved Driving Instructors uploading and refining the most frequently used roads.
  • AI predictions - which estimate the most likely routes based on data patterns.
  • Community feedback - where learners and instructors comment on changes and keep routes up to date.

The result is a constantly evolving set of routes that many learners say improves their confidence and, in some cases, their pass rates.

The ethical question

Does practising these routes give learners an unfair advantage, or is it simply smart preparation in a system where failure means months of waiting? The DVSA designs tests to be flexible, and examiners can adjust the route at any time. Still, with thousands now using RouteBuddy and passing their tests, the debate over fairness is set to continue.

Key facts

  • Pass rate (car practical test, GB): 47.0%
  • Average waiting time: 18–20 weeks; some centres >5 months
  • Retake gap: minimum 10 working days after failing
  • Sat nav usage: 4 out of 5 tests since 2017
  • DVSA stopped publishing routes in 2010

Media Contact
Company Name: Media Press
Contact Person: Media Press
Email: Send Email
Country: United Kingdom
Website: https://www.fiverr.com/s/wkQV9oo

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.