ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

How to Calculate Burst Pressure and Wall Thickness for Seamless Pipes

An engineer reviewing pipeline design schematics with pressure calculation formulas overlaid, representing pipeline safety.

Introduction: The Mathematics of Pipeline Safety

In the pipeline engineering profession, safety and efficiency are not nebulous ideas, they just evolve out of measuring. When it comes to seamless pipes in high-consequence applications, two of the easiest calculations to perform are, determining the minimum required wall thickness at a specific pressure, and testing the Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP) for a given pipe.

This guide goes beyond theoretical insights and provides a hands-on and practical reference to these important calculations. We will provide a real-world example, using the fundamental Barlow's Formula, and apply it to show how engineers derive material specifications into safe, reliable pipeline designs.

I. The Foundation: Barlow's Formula and Its Components

Barlow's Formula is the watchword for fundamental pipeline pressure computations. It provides an unambiguous link between pipe dimensions, material strength and pressure containment capability.

The formula is most commonly expressed to solve for pressure:

solve for pressure.png

  • P= Internal Pressure (in psi)
  • t= Nominal Wall Thickness (in inches)
  • D= Outside Diameter (in inches)
  • S= Allowable Stress (in psi). This is the critical variable. It is not the full strength of the material but a fraction of it, determined by the material's Specified Minimum Yield Strength (SMYS) and a Design Factor (F).

Design Factor (F).png

The Design Factor (F), which is always less than 1.0 and is a defined safety-related multiplier in the regulations (ASME B31.4 or B31.8) is a function of the class location of the pipeline. For example:

  • F = 0.72:Class 1 (Rural areas)
  • F = 0.60:Class 2 (Towns, industrial areas)
  • F = 0.50:Class 3 (Densely populated urban areas)

II. Practical Calculation 1: Determining Minimum Wall Thickness

An engineer's most common task is to calculate the minimum wall thickness required to safely handle a specified operating pressure. To do this, we rearrange Barlow's Formula to solve for t:

solve for t.png

Example:An API 5L X52 seamless pipe will be used for a pipeline with a MAOP of 1,480 psi. The pipe has an Outside Diameter of 16 inches and will be installed in a rural, Class 1 location.

Identify the variables:

  • P = 1,480 psi
  • D = 16 in
  • SMYS for X52 = 52,000 psi
  • F for Class 1 = 0.72

Calculate Allowable Stress (S):

  • S = 52,000 psi * 0.72 = 37,440 psi

Calculate Minimum Wall Thickness (t):

Calculate Minimum Wall Thickness (t).png

Therefore, the minimum required wall thickness for this pipe is 0.316 inches. The engineer would then select the next standard available wall thickness (e.g., 0.375 inches).

III. Practical Calculation 2: Verifying MAOP

Reverse calculation is used to determine safe maximum operating pressure for piping (a pipe with a known wall thinness). This is always done when verifying the capacity of existing infrastructure.

Example:You currently have an API 5L X65 seamless pipe with an Outside Diameter of 20 inches, with a nominal wall thickness of 0.500 inches. The pipeline is located in a Class 2 location.

Identify the variables:

  • t = 0.500 in
  • D = 20 in
  • SMYS for X65 = 65,000 psi
  • F for Class 2 = 0.60

Calculate Allowable Stress (S):

  • S = 65,000 psi * 0.60 = 39,000 psi

Calculate MAOP (P):

Calculate MAOP (P).png

IV. A Critical Addition: Corrosion Allowance

The calculations above have now given the structural minimum wall thickness. The structural minimum wall thickness is not sufficient for long-term integrity of the pipeline. Engineers also need to provide a corrosion allowance. The corrosion allowance is a layer of thickness on top of the design wall thickness to take into consideration the amount of metal loss due to corrosion over its design life.

If the calculated structural thickness (t) is 0.316 inches and the project specifies a corrosion allowance of 0.0625 inches (1/16"), the required final wall thickness would be:

required final wall thickness.png

The engineer would then specify a pipe with a nominal wall thickness of 0.375 inches or greater, ensuring it meets the requirement after accounting for standard manufacturing tolerances.

Conclusion

Calculating wall thickness and MAOP is a basic skill in pipeline engineering. Using Barlow's Formula and accounting for significant variables such as material strength (SMYS), Design Factors driven by safety, and consideration for long-term Corrosion Allowance, all enable an engineer to bring an abstract standard into a physical, safe, and efficient design. This highly quantitative approach is what provides the assurance that seamless pipe can be utilized in the most demanding energy applications in the world.

Copyright Notice

This article was originally created by CORTEC STEEL LIMITED and first published on the official website www.cortecsteel.com.

Reproduction Notice

Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. For citation or reproduction, please credit the source and include a link to this article. All rights reserved.

Media Contact
Company Name: CORTEC STEEL LIMITED
Email: Send Email
Country: China
Website: https://www.cortecsteel.com/

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.