ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Concrete Admixtures Affect The Rational Mix Proportions

1. The biggest problem is a layer of bubbles on the surface of the concrete. These bubbles absorb carbon, forming small black foams. This is caused by poor adaptability, an overdose of admixtures, and high sensitivity.

2. The admixtures don’t improve slurry quality, resulting in poor coating. The crushed stone lacks slurry, becoming mushy and loose.

3. A high sand ratio leads to a large aggregate surface area, causing sand to coat the cement, resulting in a mushy and rough texture. This is similar to a mixed aggregate, and has little to do with gradation. Poor adaptability and high sensitivity of the admixtures cause bleeding even before dissolving, with oil and carbon rising to the surface and adsorbing with the bubbles, forming a layer of foam. This is the key issue. The admixtures not improving slurry quality and the high sand ratio both contribute to the loose concrete, with a large aggregate surface area and sand coating the cement, forming a mixed aggregate.

With the same materials, even with 10 experts designing, if the experts don’t know how to adjust the admixtures, their coordination may still be problematic. For example, if water-reducing admixture A doesn’t improve slurry quality and coating, and the sand ratio is 40% with 25% small stone, the experts might consider it good. However, I will adjust the water-reducing agent and admixture B. I will increase the slurry coating, with a 38% sand ratio and 20% small stones. This results in better coating, a better skeleton structure, higher strength, a smaller aggregate specific surface area, more naturally flowing slurry, less water requirement, better flow and slump retention, and lower costs. Therefore, all the expert advice about mix design methods is nonsense. First, increase the slurry coating, then adjust the mix ratio based on the coating.

bea2d309-7e9e-4aec-932e-d8e7fddf47b9

Problems:

1. The center of the concrete is shiny (like oil stains on a collar from not showering for a long time). This indicates too much sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate is cheap, but too much can cause bleeding.

2. The concrete is reddish, like mud, indicating too much and poor-quality concrete admixture, likely granular soil or construction waste (red bricks). This admixture has a high gas absorption rate; even adding over 10 kg of gas won’t draw it out, leading to severe bleeding.

3. Poor aggregate gradation, such as mixed aggregate in commercial concrete, lacking fine particles. The sand is too coarse, with too few fine particles. Both of these factors lead to a lack of adhering material for the gas, resulting in gas loss at the outlet and gas not being able to be drawn in, causing leakage.

4. Low sand ratio in the mix design can also cause leakage (this is only a possibility), because the gas cannot be drawn in. If the gas is drawn in and properly coated, the sand ratio may be quite high.

5. Leakage cannot be ruled out due to low C3A cement and the addition of phosphogypsum.

Media Contact
Company Name: Shandong Jufu Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.
Email: Send Email
Address:Bld. 4-1001, No. 2177, Tianchen Rd., Jinan
City: Shandong
Country: China
Website: https://www.jufuchemtech.com/

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  248.50
-0.52 (-0.21%)
AAPL  266.43
+7.60 (2.94%)
AMD  258.12
+3.05 (1.20%)
BAC  54.32
+0.97 (1.82%)
GOOG  334.47
+3.89 (1.18%)
META  671.58
+9.09 (1.37%)
MSFT  411.22
+18.11 (4.61%)
NVDA  198.87
+2.36 (1.20%)
ORCL  169.81
+6.81 (4.18%)
TSLA  391.95
+27.75 (7.62%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.