ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

The Shares of the Electric-vehicle Producer Surged by 14 Percent After Polestar Concluded Its Merger With SPAC

After Polestar (NASDAQ: PSNY) concluded its merger with SPAC the previous day, the shares of the electric-vehicle producer surged by 14 percent. LCID is down 0.47 percent on the news.

There is no direct competition for Lucid (ticker: LCID). Polestar (PSNY) builds the $48,000 all-electric Polestar 2, which competes with Tesla’s (TSLA) Model 3 (TSLA +4.52 percent). While Tesla’s Model S Plaid may cost up to $155,000, Lucid’s $170,000 Air Dream Edition is even more expensive.

The problem is that Polestar’s valuation of Lucid stock makes it seem overpriced. With 2.1 billion shares in circulation, Polestar has a market value of $26 billion. Polestar’s expected 2023 revenues of $6.6 billion are valued at 3.9 times that amount.

The price of Lucid, which is valued at over $29 billion, is more than eight times the $3.5 billion in revenues expected in 2023. In comparison to XPeng (XPEV), NIO (NIO +4.47%), Li Auto (LI +3.95%), and Rivian Automotive (RIVN +0.10%), who all have sales but no free cash flow, that’s costly. All of these EV startups trade for roughly 2.6 times projected sales in the year 2023.

Why is Lucid so much more costly than other options? It’s safe to say that the main deciding factor is Saudi ownership. Investors may assume that the Saudi Public Investment Support, which owns 61 percent of Lucid shares, would continue to fund the company indefinitely. The LIV golf breakaway tour, which has been accused of introducing “irrational rivalry” to golf, was funded by Saudi Arabia in the past.

Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth & Investment Management, calls Lucid “the LIV tour for EVs.” I don’t think it can and won’t be profitable.

He’s got a good point. Companies like Tesla are focusing on more affordable automobiles since the market for ultra-expensive cars (whether regular or electric) is minimal. Model X and S cars made up around 25,000 of Tesla’s total sales in 2021; the more economical Model 3 and Y models made up the rest. For “sentimental reasons,” Tesla CEO, Elon Musk remarked, the business continues to produce the X and S electric vehicles.

Lucid, which has sold around 500 vehicles in the previous two quarters and is scheduled to sell approximately 13,000 in 2022, faces a fundamental risk that sales could plateau or drop as the high end of the EV market becomes crowded. There’s no good news for Lucid’s multiples in this situation.

Rallying stocks are real. It’s still a bear market.

NIO is a shining example of this. Currently, the stock is trading at 2.4 times 2023 sales, which is a 47% drop from 8 times in early 2021. In part, this is due to China’s economic woes, but a large part of it is related to the slowdown in volume growth that’s occurred recently. In Wedbush analyst Dan Ives’ estimations, “the multiple was shattered as the growth slowed sharply. It’s a cautionary story for the EV industry to learn from NIO.

On 2023 sales predictions, Lucid’s stock may collapse to $7, down 64% from its Friday closing price of $19.21. Even though the company has already plunged 73% from its 52-week high of roughly $58.

The post The Shares of the Electric-vehicle Producer Surged by 14 Percent After Polestar Concluded Its Merger With SPAC appeared first on Best Stocks.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.