ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Hagens Berman: Las Vegas Hotel Operators Sued for Alleged Scheme to Illegally Inflate Hotel Room Rates to Record Highs

Class-action lawsuit says hotel companies colluded with third party, Rainmaker, in massive Las Vegas Strip collusion, price-fixing

Consumers who rented hotel rooms on the Las Vegas Strip filed a class-action lawsuit today accusing 4 of Vegas’ largest gaming and hospitality companies of engaging in an illegal price-fixing scheme to raise the cost of hotel rooms, according to Hagens Berman.

The lawsuit alleges that Rainmaker, a revenue management platform used by an estimated 90% of Vegas Strip hotels, collects real-time pricing and supply information from competitors and provides room rental rate recommendations designed to unlawfully maximize profits for its hotel operator users. Attorneys say this algorithmic-driven price-fixing comes at the expense of consumers and in violation of antitrust laws.

Attorneys say that in a competitive market, hotel operators would price rooms independently and would fill as many rooms as possible. The sharing of pricing and capacity information through Rainmaker has displaced normal competitive pricing and lead to increased room prices, according to the lawsuit, and antitrust academics have roundly criticized this type of price and supply exchange as anticompetitive.

If you’ve rented a hotel room on the Las Vegas Strip on or after Jan. 25, 2019, you may have overpaid. Find out more about your potential rights against Vegas hotel operators.

The lawsuit names as defendants Caesars Entertainment, MGM, Treasure Island, Wynn, Rainmaker, and Cendyn for their involvement in the alleged price-fixing scheme.

“Our antitrust attorneys have uncovered what appears to be an unlawful agreement in which Rainmaker collects and shares data between Vegas hotel competitors to unlawfully raise prices of hotel rooms,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman and attorney seeking to represent consumers in the case. “What happens in Vegas will no longer stay in Vegas. We intend to expose the under-the-table deals perpetrated by these Vegas hotels, and we intend to hold them accountable.”

Numbers Game

According to the lawsuit, Las Vegas hotel room prices are currently at record highs.

Rainmaker advertises 15% revenue growth for its hotel operator users, and testimonials on the website for its parent company, Cendyn, describe implausible performance during market downturns and even the COVID-19 pandemic. The lawsuit quotes a Cendyn hotel customer claiming to have produced 70% of the prior year’s revenue with 50% of the volume despite closures and restrictions throughout the pandemic.

The named hotel operators hold a significant share of Vegas Strip hotels, collectively controlling approximately 20 of the 30 total available, including Caesars Entertainment (Flamingo, The Linq, Caesars Palace, Harrah’s, Horseshoe, The Cromwell, Paris and Planet Hollywood), MGM Resorts International (Excalibur, Luxor, MGM Grand, Park MGM, New York New York, Bellagio, Mandalay Bay, CityCenter and Cosmopolitan), Treasure Island and Wynn Resorts (Encore and Wynn). The lawsuit states that defendants’ control of the market enabled the scheme.

Each of the defendant operators relied on Rainmaker’s algorithms to provide pricing recommendations. Rainmaker’s algorithms focused on maximizing Defendants’ profitability, at the expense of competition. The lawsuit quotes a Rainmaker VP of revenue analytics stating, “the ultimate goal is not chasing after occupancy growth, but instead maximizing profits across all revenue streams.” This is contrary to a free and fair market, the complaint states, where producers increase their revenue by growing their supply, not restricting it.

“By incentivizing its users to suppress the supply of hotel rooms, Rainmaker artificially drove up prices and directly harmed consumers,” said Berman. “These corporations created a scenario in which the house will always win, and they’ve broken the law to do so.”

The lawsuit states that Rainmaker’s proprietary software, Guestrev, analyzes hotel clientele and makes dynamic pricing recommendations based on this data, “to help ensure the properties reward the right customers with the right rates at the right time.” The complaint goes on to say that Cendyn has specifically contrasted this pricing strategy to hotel operators’ prior approach, wherein all guests were charged either a standard rate or a frequent gambler rate. Rainmaker also offers a program called RevCaster, which it explicitly advertises as a method for users to monitor competitor pricing and occupancy rates.

The lawsuit brings claims for violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act against hotel operators for their use of Rainmaker software. Hagens Berman seeks to hold the defendants liable for repayment to those who have overpaid as a result of the scheme.

Find out more about the consumer lawsuit against Vegas hotel operators.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving actual results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.