ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

New Research Shows Water Quality, Availability and Cost Among Top Concerns for Southern Californians

Survey of 1,000 consumers gauges public attitudes on water issues within the region

A majority of Southern California consumers are concerned about the availability and safety of their drinking water, and about half are willing to pay higher rates for investments that address supply issues, according to a recent Metropolitan Water District survey.

Following one of the state’s wettest winters, 77% of respondents said they are continuing to make an effort to save water through a variety of conservation actions in their homes and yards. In addition to identifying top water issues of concern, the poll of 1,000 residents across Metropolitan’s six-county service area focused on the public’s opinion of how Metropolitan and local water agencies are performing, the taste and quality of tap water, preferences on bottled water use and residents’ commitment to conservation.

Metropolitan General Manager Adel Hagekhalil said the collected data will support Metropolitan’s efforts to understand public attitudes and awareness of water issues so that it can better engage with its communities regarding needed water resource investments as part of the district’s ongoing Climate Adaptation Master Planning effort.

“California’s weather extremes and climate whiplash are increasingly making water management more challenging,” Hagekhalil said. “This new data makes it clear that the communities we serve are committed to conservation and rightfully concerned about the future of their water supplies with climate change. Finding solutions requires us all to work together and to take bold action to secure a reliable and resilient water future for all with no one left behind.”

Results of the poll – funded by Metropolitan and performed by consultant EMC Research – was presented to the Metropolitan board’s Legislative, Regulatory Affairs and Communications Committee on Monday (June 12). The survey, conducted via telephone interviews and online surveys in English and Spanish in early May, found that about 64% of respondents believe that there is a real threat to Southern California’s water supplies and that we may not have enough water for the future. When asked to choose, 57% think Southern California water agencies’ highest priority should be ensuring we have adequate water supplies to meet our region’s needs compared with 37% who said the priority should be improving the safety and quality of their drinking water.

About two-thirds of residents agree that water supply investments are necessary, but just half are willing to personally pay for the improvements.

Though 62% of respondents agreed that their tap water is safe to drink and 48% think their tap water tastes good, 60% preferred to pay for bottled water instead of drinking from their tap. There also is a higher concern and less trust in tap water among BIPOC (Black, indigenous, and people of color) residents.

“It’s clear that we as water providers across Southern California must do more to increase trust within the communities we serve and bring everyone into the conversation –on both water supply and water quality issues,” said Metropolitan Board Director Barry D. Pressman, who chairs the board’s Subcommittee on Public Affairs Engagement. “Water is essential. It’s imperative the public understands the significant challenges we face and the opportunities before us to overcome them.”

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.