ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Vehicle Manufacturer Websites that Lack Foundational Elements Experience Decrease in Satisfaction, J.D. Power Finds

Mercedes-Benz and GMC Rank Highest in Respective Segment

Approximately one-third of digital experiences on vehicle manufacturer websites—32% among mass market brands and 38% among premium brands—fail to meet basic needs for speed and design. When these foundational elements are not met, overall satisfaction falls significantly compared with websites that fully deliver on them, according to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Manufacturer Website Evaluation StudySM—Summer, released today. Specifically, if a website meets expectations for foundational elements such as speed, consistent design, organized layout and a modern appearance, overall satisfaction is 752 (on a 1,000-point scale). If a website does not meet foundational expectations, satisfaction drops to 664.

“Animations and auto-playing videos can enhance the appearance of automotive websites, but it comes at the cost of slower speed perceptions,” said Jon Sundberg, senior director of digital solutions at J.D. Power. “When comparing the presence of foundational elements across other J.D. Power website evaluation studies for wealth management, retirement plan and insurance, these vehicle manufacturer websites fall short. To help drive an increase in user satisfaction, automakers must start with the basic elements before enhancing the experience further.”

The J.D. Power U.S. Manufacturer Website Evaluation Study is a semiannual study that measures customer satisfaction of automotive manufacturer websites during the process of shopping for a new vehicle by examining five key measures (in order of importance): visual appeal; navigation; speed; vehicle research; and research tools.

Study Rankings

Mercedes-Benz ranks highest among premium manufacturer websites with a score of 788. Audi (758) and Tesla (758) each rank second in a tie.

GMC ranks highest among mass market manufacturer websites with a score of 728. Ram (723) ranks second and Dodge (721) ranks third.

See the rank charts for each segment at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2025072.

The U.S. Manufacturer Website Evaluation Study, initially released in 1999, is based on responses from 11,863 new-vehicle shoppers who indicate they will be in the market for a new vehicle within the next 12 months. The study was fielded in May 2025.

For more information about the U.S. Manufacturer Website Evaluation Study, visit https://www.jdpower.com/business/resource/us-manufacturer-website-evaluation-study.

About J.D. Power

J.D. Power is a global leader in automotive data and analytics, and provides industry intelligence, consumer insights and advisory solutions to the automotive industry and selected non-automotive industries. J.D. Power leverages its extensive proprietary datasets and software capabilities combined with advanced analytics and artificial intelligence tools to help its clients optimize business performance.

J.D. Power was founded in 1968 and has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit JDPower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules: http://www.jdpower.com/business/about-us/press-release-info

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.