ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

The current dilemma and the way out of mobile payment in South Africa

The current dilemma and the way out of mobile payment in South Africa

The current dilemma and the way out of mobile payment in South Africa

PRETORIA, GAUTENG , SOUTH AFRICA, July 1, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ -- PT-Wallet, a longserving operator of Amazon, Mercadolivre, and Aliexpress, seized the historical opportunity presented by the Internet revolution in 2020 with the launch of the first Internet AI intelligent matching system, achieving significant success in the US, UK, Mexico, and Brazil. These days, PT-wallet trumpeted its comprehensive expansion into the mobile payment space, entering the South African market. In this regard, PT-Wallet's CEO John claimed in an interview: South Africa is the most developed country in the entire Africa, we highly value the South African market. However, the existing mobile payment has created a giant obstacle for PT-Wallet, mainly owing to the sluggish payment in South Africa which leads to the current mobile payment could only be performed under the banking system with less real-time performance. Accordingly, it takes 2-3 working days to complete the bulk collection as well as payment for general enterprises, failing to achieve instant transfer, which turns out to be the major barrier in the process of promoting mobile internet programs.

According to relevant reports, despite the lack of a coherent definition of mobile payment, it can be categorized into mobile payment with a wallet (M-PESA) or without a wallet (Google pay and Apple Pay), with the former regarded as a payment method and the latter more of a payment channel. One of the most critical differences between the two classifications is whether or not a user's account system is available, and the payment channel requires at least one payment method to accomplish the payment.
By virtue of the South African Banks Act (Act no. 94 of 1990), the issuance of a mobile money wallet is considered to be an act of deposit taking. Hence, only banks can issue E-Wallets. In other words, either the bank's own E-Wallet business, or the cooperation between the third party and the bank. The diagram is as follows:

Probably for this reason, E-Wallets in South Africa do not catch on. Despite E-Wallet from FNB Bank being deemed an impressive business, there are only 6.4 million users as of the end of June 2019 since its launch in 2009, with only 1 million monthly active users. In most African countries, telecommunications operators have achieved some success in terms of mobile money. However, Vodacom and MTN in South Africa both took this business offline in 2016. Note: MTN went live again at the end of January this year, yet FNB didn't appear to be taking it seriously.

Overall, there are two possible options for operating the mobile payment in South Africa.
1.Apply for a banking license and issue mobile wallet independently. Currently, digital banking is available for application, which is the optimal approach to operate entirely online;
2.Cooperate intensively with a bank, taking advantage of the bank's mobile wallet. In this sense, SnapScan is a typical, and there is reason to believe that Standard Bank endorses its wallet (or directly provide it with a set of wallet, which is not instant money, and this is different from South Africa's WeChat payment).

If South Africa can liberalize some policies on mobile payment in the next 1-2 years, South Africa's mobile Internet will definitely gain new life and vigor.

Payment information
Payment information
email us here

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.