ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Dine Brands (NYSE:DIN) Reports Q1 In Line With Expectations

DIN Cover Image

Casual restaurant chain Dine Brands (NYSE: DIN) met Wall Street’s revenue expectations in Q1 CY2025, with sales up 4.1% year on year to $214.8 million. Its non-GAAP profit of $1.03 per share was 16.7% below analysts’ consensus estimates.

Is now the time to buy Dine Brands? Find out by accessing our full research report, it’s free.

Dine Brands (DIN) Q1 CY2025 Highlights:

  • Revenue: $214.8 million vs analyst estimates of $215.1 million (4.1% year-on-year growth, in line)
  • Adjusted EPS: $1.03 vs analyst expectations of $1.24 (16.7% miss)
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $54.73 million vs analyst estimates of $57.31 million (25.5% margin, 4.5% miss)
  • EBITDA guidance for the full year is $240 million at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $235.4 million
  • Operating Margin: 18.1%, down from 21.9% in the same quarter last year
  • Free Cash Flow Margin: 6.8%, down from 13.2% in the same quarter last year
  • Locations: 3,408 at quarter end, down from 3,445 in the same quarter last year
  • Market Capitalization: $312.3 million

"As we navigate the current operating environment, the fundamentals of our business remain strong, and since the second half of the quarter, we’re seeing steady improvement across sales, traffic, and our development pipeline," said John Peyton, Chief Executive Officer of Dine Brands Global

Company Overview

Operating a franchise model, Dine Brands (NYSE: DIN) is a casual restaurant chain that owns the Applebee’s and IHOP banners.

Sales Growth

A company’s long-term sales performance is one signal of its overall quality. Even a bad business can shine for one or two quarters, but a top-tier one grows for years.

With $820.9 million in revenue over the past 12 months, Dine Brands is a small restaurant chain, which sometimes brings disadvantages compared to larger competitors benefiting from better brand awareness and economies of scale.

As you can see below, Dine Brands struggled to increase demand as its $820.9 million of sales for the trailing 12 months was close to its revenue six years ago (we compare to 2019 to normalize for COVID-19 impacts). This was mainly because it didn’t open many new restaurants and observed lower sales at existing, established dining locations.

Dine Brands Quarterly Revenue

This quarter, Dine Brands grew its revenue by 4.1% year on year, and its $214.8 million of revenue was in line with Wall Street’s estimates.

Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 4.7% over the next 12 months. While this projection implies its newer menu offerings will fuel better top-line performance, it is still below the sector average.

Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we’ve identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.

Restaurant Performance

Number of Restaurants

The number of dining locations a restaurant chain operates is a critical driver of how quickly company-level sales can grow.

Dine Brands listed 3,408 locations in the latest quarter and has kept its restaurant count flat over the last two years while other restaurant businesses have opted for growth.

When a chain doesn’t open many new restaurants, it usually means there’s stable demand for its meals and it’s focused on improving operational efficiency to increase profitability.

Dine Brands Operating Locations

Same-Store Sales

A company's restaurant base only paints one part of the picture. When demand is high, it makes sense to open more. But when demand is low, it’s prudent to close some locations and use the money in other ways. Same-store sales provides a deeper understanding of this issue because it measures organic growth at restaurants open for at least a year.

Dine Brands’s demand has been shrinking over the last two years as its same-store sales have averaged 1.8% annual declines. This performance isn’t ideal, and we’d be concerned if Dine Brands starts opening new restaurants to artificially boost revenue growth.

Note that Dine Brands reports its same-store sales intermittently, so some data points are missing in the chart below.

Dine Brands Same-Store Sales Growth

Key Takeaways from Dine Brands’s Q1 Results

It was encouraging to see Dine Brands’s full-year EBITDA guidance beat analysts’ expectations. On the other hand, both its EBITDA and EPS fell short of Wall Street’s estimates due to weaker profitability, as revenue was in line. Overall, this was a mixed quarter. The stock remained flat at $19.95 immediately following the results.

Dine Brands’s earnings report left more to be desired. Let’s look forward to see if this quarter has created an opportunity to buy the stock. When making that decision, it’s important to consider its valuation, business qualities, as well as what has happened in the latest quarter. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it’s free.

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  224.66
-1.53 (-0.68%)
AAPL  274.75
-3.53 (-1.27%)
AMD  213.84
+3.06 (1.45%)
BAC  55.82
+0.68 (1.23%)
GOOG  309.86
-0.66 (-0.21%)
META  646.83
+2.60 (0.40%)
MSFT  477.05
-1.48 (-0.31%)
NVDA  177.13
+2.11 (1.21%)
ORCL  183.12
-6.85 (-3.61%)
TSLA  477.89
+18.93 (4.12%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.