• Image 01
  • Image 02
  • Image 03
  • Image 04
  • Image 05
  • Image 06
Need assistance? Contact Us: 1-800-255-5897

Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Company Overview
    • Management Team
    • Board of Directors
  • Your Loan Service Center
  • MAKE A PAYMENT
  • Business Service Center
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Company Overview
    • Management Team
    • Board of Directors
  • Your Loan Service Center
  • MAKE A PAYMENT
  • Business Service Center
  • Contact Us
My Watchlist
Create Watchlist
Indicators
DJI
Nasdaq Composite
SPX
Gold
Crude Oil
Markets
Stocks
ETFs
Tools
Markets:
Overview
News
Currencies
International
Treasuries

Philip Kretsedemas Publishes An Original Study on Asylum Law in Laws Journal

By: Zexprwire
May 15, 2025 at 06:59 AM EDT

Massachusetts, US, 15th May 2025, ZEX PR WIRE, Scholar and policy analyst Philip Kretsedemas has published a landmark peer-reviewed article titled Explaining Asylum Law Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the internationally recognized journal Laws (Volume 13, Issue 4). The article explores the complex interplay between jurisprudence and politics in U.S. asylum decisions, using an innovative application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine how appellate courts rule on asylum cases involving kinship-based claims.

Kretsedemas’ research marks a major contribution to legal studies by spotlighting the underappreciated role of jurisprudential reasoning—especially the “nexus” requirement—in asylum case outcomes. In contrast to previous work that emphasized political partisanship, his analysis reveals that judicial decisions were most strongly influenced by case-specific legal reasoning and court-specific decision patterns.

The study focuses on asylum rulings from the first year of the Trump presidency, when immigration law was under intense political scrutiny. By honing in on 35 family-based asylum cases out of 319 total reviewed, the article shows how logic-based legal principles often overpowered overt political affiliations in determining outcomes. According to the findings, two key factors—whether the petitioner established a clear nexus between their persecution and a protected ground, and the unique decision-making patterns of individual appellate courts—were the most decisive.

“This study is about clarifying the mechanics of legal decision-making and showing that legal reasoning still matters,” Kretsedemas explains. “While politics certainly exerts influence, it doesn’t always determine outcomes in the way many assume.”

Kretsedemas brings over two decades of interdisciplinary expertise to the topic, blending sociological insight with legal analysis. His article also serves as a call to other researchers to adopt QCA as a valuable tool for examining small but richly detailed legal case populations.

The article is open access and available via MDPI at: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/4/53.

More News

View More
Microsoft 365 Premium Marks the Next Phase of AI Monetization
October 12, 2025
Via MarketBeat
Topics Artificial Intelligence
Tickers MSFT
Could Target’s Week of Discounts Come Full Circle for Investors?
October 12, 2025
Via MarketBeat
Topics Economy
Tickers AAPL GE TGT WMT
3 Reasons to Buy Sprouts Farmers Market Ahead of Earnings
October 12, 2025
Via MarketBeat
Tickers SFM
Bassett Furniture: Buy Now, Sit Back, and Collect Dividends
October 11, 2025
Via MarketBeat
Tickers BSET ETD HVT
AST SpaceMobile's Big Win: Shares Soar on New Deal With Verizon
October 11, 2025
Via MarketBeat
Tickers ASTS JOBY RGTI T VOD VZ
Recent Quotes
View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
GOOG  237.49
+0.00 (0.00%)
Site Logo
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.

Having difficulty making your payments? We're here to help! Call 1-800-255-5897

Copyright © 2019 Franklin Credit Management Corporation
All Rights Reserved
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Sitemap